Elections & Voting

Tribal Elections

State, Local, and Federal Elections

Basic Voting Information

In order to vote in Wisconsin you must:

● Be a citizen of the United States
● Be a resident of Wisconsin for at least 28 days
● Be 18 years old
● Proof of identification when voting at a polling place.  A Tribal ID is accepted.
● Not have been convicted of treason, felony or bribery, or have had your civil rights restored
● Not have been found by a court to be incapable of understanding the objective of the electoral process
● Not make or benefit from a bet or wage depending on the result of an election

Registration Deadline: 20 days before the election (or completed in the local voter registration office up to 5:00 PM the day before the election, or completed at the polling place on election day)

Click here for more information about voting.

2026 Spring Election Candidate Responses

In advance of the 2026 Spring General Election on April 7, 2026, the Oneida Nation and its conduit fund, Voices For Oneida, invited candidates on the ballot in certain state and local races to share information about themselves and their campaigns with the enrolled members of the Oneida Nation. Below are the responses that we received for the following races.

Wisconsin Supreme Court:

Chris Taylor

Why are you running for the Wisconsin Supreme Court?

Over my 30-year legal career as an attorney, former legislator, and now judge, my work has been guided by my core principles – ensuring that every Wisconsinite has equal access to justice and protecting their rights and freedoms. I became a lawyer because the law is a powerful tool in helping to improve people’s lives and lifting people up. It has never been more important in my lifetime to have a strong Wisconsin Supreme Court to protect our rights and freedoms, our democracy, and our state.  As a Supreme Court justice, I will protect the independence of our courts that must serve the people of this state, not the out-of-state billionaires and powerful special interests.

What makes you supremely qualified to serve as a Supreme Court justice?

I bring a diverse legal career to the bench that no current sitting justice has. In my 30-year legal career, as a practicing attorney, I represented everyday Wisconsinites who needed legal help. As the law and policy director for Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin, I worked every day to make sure Wisconsinites had access to affordable, life-saving care and the ability to make their own personal, private healthcare decisions. As a state legislator, I worked to expand access to affordable healthcare for all Wisconsinites, keep our drinking water safe, and make sure working people get a slice of the pie they help make every day. As a judge, I have a deep commitment to fairness, ensuring everyone has an opportunity to be heard and protecting our most precious rights and freedoms. My career has prepared me to serve thoughtfully, impartially, and independently on the Wisconsin Supreme Court, with always an eye towards justice. 

Do you have an overarching judicial philosophy?

My judicial philosophy is people-centered. I believe that the law and the judiciary must be centered on the people it serves and in solving problems and delivering justice in the most fair and independent way possible.

What are your thoughts on taking a nonpartisan approach to deciding cases?

That is what I have done throughout my career as a judge. The people of Wisconsin deserve a strong, independent Supreme Court that is going to protect their rights, hold the other branches of government accountable when they act unlawfully or unconstitutionally, and that protects the independence of our state against the overreach of the federal government. 

Do you feel you can be impartial from political pressures or public opinion?

Absolutely. I have done this every day on the bench. My focus is on making sure I am thoughtfully considering every party’s position in a case, that I do thorough research to ensure that I am applying the law correctly, and that I am explaining my decisions and reaching a just and fair conclusion. My decisions are guided by the law, delivering justice, and my life-long commitment to protecting the rights of Wisconsinites. 

What experience or knowledge do you have with laws specific to the rights of Native Americans and Indian tribes?

I welcome the opportunity to partner with tribal courts to gain a great understanding of tribal law and promote collaboration. As a practitioner in the family law area, I have had some experience with WICWA during custody disputes. In the legislature, I was also an advocate for Wisconsin’s tribal communities, supporting proactive measures. As a Justice on the Wisconsin Supreme Court, I will continue to ensure that tribal rights and sovereignty are respected and protected under the law.

Maria Lazar

Why are you running for the Wisconsin Supreme Court?

I am running for the State Supreme Court to restore justice, independence, impartiality, and integrity to the courts. I believe every case deserves a fair hearing, free from political influence or partisanship. I have grown increasingly concerned that our judicial elections have turned into bitter, partisan political campaigns where the qualifications and judicial experience of the candidates is ignored and special interest and political parties vie to seat their preferred justice. My home state of Wisconsin deserves better. It deserves a Justice who will remember that the sole purpose of the courts is interpret the Constitution and laws, not to legislate from the bench. The goal of justice is not to please any party, but to serve the people.

I have lived my entire professional career with the sole purpose to serve justice, to respect the laws, and to protect the rights of the people of my state. This is a race to restore to the Supreme Court that sense of fairness and integrity that appears to have faltered. Every day that I enter my courthouse or place on my black robe, I remember that obligation – that I owe a solemn duty to the people who have elected me as their judge. I believe that I am the better candidate in this race, that I can do much good for the people of this state, and that my determination and dedication to the law will enhance my service.

The short answer to this question, is that I am running because I believe, in my heart, that this is the right thing to do at this time.

What makes you supremely qualified to serve as a Supreme Court justice?

Quite simply, I have the background both legally and judicially that make me exceedingly qualified for the position of Justice. My entire professional career has led me to this role. After graduating from Mount Mary College, I received my law degree, with honors, from Georgetown University Law Center. I spent two decades as a litigator in a small law firm that represented middle class businesses and people trying to secure their rights, followed by five years as an Assistant Attorney General at the Wisconsin Department of Justice, where I represented agencies and officials. It was my work representing the Department of Children and Families in a foster care case where I was devastated when a Dane County Judge told me that the law did not matter. Knowing I could do better, I ran for circuit judge in Waukesha County and served seven years on that bench in many rotations and as presiding judge in two. I then ran for Court of Appeals Judge in District 2, where I have served for four years. My opponent spent two years on the criminal bench after her appointment and has only been on the appellate court for about three years.

During my 11 years as a judge, I have faithfully applied the law to ensure justice for all parties. Unlike a politician, I have never (and will never) legislate from the bench. I presided over Drug Treatment Court. I have taught literacy to adults and served on community boards. I have been active in my church, my children’s schools, and I consistently educate students, lawyers and judges about the courts and our legal system.

My years in private practice, public service, on the trial bench and now as an appellate judge make me the more qualified candidate in this race. I have never been a member of a political party, and I have never been appointed to any judicial position. That is the opposite for my opponent.

Aside from the vast difference in experience and litigation from my opponent, I approach my judicial role with humility and an understanding that I am but a part of one branch of our government and that my role (as is the role of every judge) is only to say what the law is, not what I want it to be. I take my oath of office seriously. We swear to uphold the Constitutions and to administer justice “without respect to persons.” That means that a good judge/justice never looks at who is in front of them in the courtroom, or which side has a better lawyer, or is a bigger company, or a member of a political or social group. I discover the facts and then I apply the law as it is written and make a rational, reasonable decision that is made without respect to persons.

I went to law school so that I could give something back to my state and its citizens. I became a judge because I saw justice was being trampled upon and knew that I could do better. I am fair, independent, and impartial. I have no ties — and have never had any ties — to a political party or partisan group. It is critical to the people of my state that they elect a Justice to this court who has the courage to stand strong against the winds of chaos, who will set aside all political biases and agendas, and will serve as a humble and faithful servant of the law.

Do you have an overarching judicial philosophy?

Yes. I am an originalist with a leaning towards textualism. I believe that the Constitution is the rock to which our republic is anchored. That means that the text of our law should always first be given the original public meaning that they had when they were drafted. The first, and best, source of interpretation is the words and phrases used by the legislature when it drafts our laws. Judges are not supposed to scrutinize documents in an effort to find a hidden intent by the drafters. We should consider the language of the text, and only when it is ambiguous, should we look further. First, we should look to the rest of the statute, its heading, and surrounding statutes. Then we can go to secondary sources such as dictionaries, grammar books, and other legal documents that were written at the same time. Our laws must have a fixed or settled meaning or we will invite uncertainty and leave the door open for judicial activism.

Following this practice is in line with the respect due to the separation of powers doctrine. The rule of law is one of – if not the most basic – fundamental principles in our representative democracy. To ensure that the law is respected, a judge/justice must be independent of agendas, political persuasion, and bias. Judges must never align themselves with a political parties or special interest groups. To do so is to jeopardize the impartiality with which we must make our decisions.

The law must be a level playing field for all individuals regardless of their race, age, gender, nationality, sex, or political persuasion. Each party is entitled to respect and an opportunity to have a full and fair opportunity to present their case to the court. I have never tilted a decision based upon who was the litigant. Justice must always be blind in that respect. Judges must strike the proper balance of deference to the law as written while still upholding our duties as one of the three branches of government.

In my 11 years as a judge, I have devoted myself to respecting that law while constantly striving to interpret the laws fairly so as to protect the rights and liberties of all people in my court. Underneath it all, my role is to impartially interpret the law to give it the proper effect.

The main attributes of a good justice who follows this philosophy is to have the ability to exercise fair, impartial, and legally based judgement. I bring that to my past and current role as a judge and will bring it with me when I will be humbled to serve as the next Wisconsin State Supreme Court Justice.

What are your thoughts on taking a nonpartisan approach to deciding cases?

This is precisely what I have done every day for the past 11 years that I have had the blessing to serve as a trial court and appellate judge. My duty as a judge is to uphold the Constitution and laws, not to have or advance a political agenda. A fair court is one that serves all citizens of this state regardless of their political beliefs.

Any judge who decides to place their opinions, or those of their supporters, ahead of the law does a disservice to the state and does not deserve to wear the black robe. It is an honor to step into this role and it is one that must be done for the correct reasons. It cannot be undertaken to advance any point of view, it cannot be done to enhance the judge’s ego or perceived prestige, and it cannot be done at the behest of any outside group. I have never aligned myself with a political party, so I have never had any issues in remaining nonpartisan in all of my roles and decision-making practices as a judge.

Every litigant who walks into my court knows two things: they know that they will be treated with respect at all times and they will have a fair and full opportunity to be heard and to make their arguments. If they are unable to afford an attorney in criminal and some other matters, I will appoint one. If they are pro se and want to remain so, I will see that they understand their obligations and how to present their case.

Activist judges who advance partisan ideas are a danger to the very fabric of our judicial system. Even if they believe that they are acting for the betterment of society, a certain group, or a set cause, they are not operating as a true judge. If they want to set policy, they should run for a political office. 

A close examination of my past legal and judicial career leads to the inescapable conclusion that I will continue to act in a fair, impartial, independent and nonpartisan manner. My track record is clear. There is nothing in my nature that would alter those deeply ingrained beliefs.

Do you feel you can be impartial from political pressures or public opinion?

Absolutely. Again, this is something I have done for 11 years as a trial court and appellate judge, and it is something I will do for 10 years as a State Supreme Court Justice. It is my personal obligation to set aside any political pressures when I rule on a case. That is something that I believe in deeply and take care to follow in every matter over which I preside. Judges must always rise above partisanship in order to preserve the integrity of the judiciary. I have demonstrated that practice in each rotation in which I served (civil, criminal, Drug Treatment Court, juvenile, and mental commitment court).  Every case deserves a fair hearing that is free from any political influence. Every person in this state must have confidence that justice is not and has never been for sale. Not every decision will be one that will be popular. But, that doesn’t alter the fact that every decision must be fair.

It is just important that judges must avoid the vagaries of public opinions. We cannot base our rulings on how we think the current trends are leaning or on how we believe the public wants us to act. That is a role for the other branches of our government. As an honest, legally faithful judge, I believe in the rule of law, not in the whims of political trends or passing public fads. Those are realms that dictate how a politician or legislator acts, not a judge. My role is, as it has always been, to interpret the law, not to legislate from the bench. The goal of justice is not to please any party, but to serve the people.

A judge must be strong and have the courage to withstand the winds of fate. A strong judiciary is essential for a healthy community, and that requires independence. At every stage of my legal and judicial career, I have demonstrated that strength and independence. I have never wanted to set policy; I have never wanted to be a politician.  Throughout my entire life I have lived with only one watchword and that is justice and following the Constitution.

This election gives a 10-year term to the victor. The State of Wisconsin must carefully review each candidate, weigh what they have done and said, and determine which deserves to serve as a Justice. My past is an open book. I am transparent and honest in my approach to all questions. I have written my positions on my judicial philosophy and several important issues of the day on my website (JudgeMariaLazar.com) and in articles to the press and on social media. I am the candidate who can best, most impartially, and fairly serve my state in this role.

What experience or knowledge do you have with laws specific to the rights of Native Americans and Indian tribes?

Quite a bit. When I first started as a circuit court judge, I was given the unique honor to begin my career in the civil rotation. In Waukesha County, as in most other counties, that is not a division you place new judges in due to its complexity. But, given my extensive legal background, that is where I began. I inherited a docket from a judge who had retired, and one of his cases was a very complicated legal matter between investors and a Native American tribe (it was Saybrook Tax Exempt Investors, LLC, et al. v. Lac Du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians, et al., Waukesha County Case No. 2012-CV-0187).

In that case, there was a $50 million bond transaction to — in part — establish a riverboat casino, hotel, and bed-and-breakfast, that was never built. Instead, when that didn’t happen, the investors filed suit seeking a return of their funds. There were two phases to the case: first, equitable or legal issues that I heard as a bench trial over nine days, and then there was to be a 7-week jury trial.  In the first phase, 23 witnesses and 3 experts testified. I then issued a 55-page written opinion concerning the legal issues as to whether there were express or implied warranties, whether bond documents were void as ultra vires acts of the Tribal Parties (they were not void), whether the documents were invalid or void under the Tribal Constitution (they were not), and whether the documents constituted financial schemes that were void ab initio under the federal Indian Gaming Regulations Act (IGRA) (some were).

I was required to learn about tribal law, tribal constitutions, and IGRA. But, first, I had to determine whether I even had jurisdiction over the case. Because there was a prior waiver of sovereign immunity and a stipulation by the parties. I concluded that I had jurisdiction. The parties had also already filed and participated in a Teague Inter-Jurisdictional Conference pursuant to Teague v. Bad River Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians, 236 Wis. 2d 384, 612 N.W.2d 709 (2000) that requires as a matter of jurisdictional comity, when there are concurrent state and tribal actions the two courts should confer “in an atmosphere of mutual respect and cooperation” for the purposes of allocating jurisdiction between the two sovereigns.  Id., at ¶38.

I considered the Trial Parties’ affirmative defenses including the Tribal Constitution, IGRA (including deference to the National Indian Gaming Commission), and the Tribal Agreement and documents drafted by the parties. I also dismissed defenses that the Sole Proprietary Interest Rule or the State Gaming Compact were violated. Thus, I dismissed some of the claims and left others for the jury trial.  Before trial, we had over nine day-long hearings on motions in limine. Following that, we prepared for trial. The day of jury selection, half of the case was settled. The remainder was settled a week later. The parties were all relatively satisfied with the resolution – to the best of my knowledge (I was never told the terms of the settlement). However, all of the attorneys (there were five parties and each was represented by at least 4-6 attorneys) invited me to a dinner they had to commemorate a remarkable litigation experience. In the course of the bench trial and in anticipation of the jury trial, there were thousands of exhibits compiled and I made hundreds of rulings on various motions. It was an amazing case.

Brown County Board of Supervisors – District 11:

Dawn Spice

Why are you running for office?

I am running for office because I believe in a transparent and open government that works for all the community. I believe in community, integrity and accountability. I will fight for those beliefs and work hard for the district.

What unique expertise or experience would you bring to this office?

As a lifelong resident of Brown County, I have benefited from county services and facilities for decades. I know firsthand that these services are critical to a healthy community, and I want to ensure our services continue to both sustain needs and flourish. I also have a wealth of business experience as an administrative assistant, and I have been greatly involved in the Ashwaubenon Business Association. Being a single parent means staying organized, planning for a variety of circumstances, and being efficient with my resources and I will proudly do the same for Brown County.

What is the most important issue in your district and how would you address it?

I am advocating for the support of our county cultural services, strong infrastructure spending, and operating the county board that is accountable to the voters. The Brown County Board has a reputation for operating out of sight and not being responsive to the voters. I believe that Brown County needs to investigate how other similar communities can legally televise or stream their board and committee meetings, so all decisions are made transparent.

What challenges do you see coming down the road for Brown County in the next decade?

One of the major issues that affects everyone in the community is our degrading infrastructure. There needs to be a focus on improving county roads, bridges and infrastructure to encourage economic growth in the County.

If elected, how can you as an elected official of Brown County and the Oneida Nation work together to better all residents of the region?

Brown County and Oneida Nation have a strong history of supporting each other. As a member of the Brown County board, I will continue to work in partnership with Oneida Nation to strengthen those relationships through respect and open dialogue. Oneida Nation and Brown County benefit from working together to address the needs of our community.

How can you, in your elected position, help address taxpayer and consumer concerns about lack of affordability (i.e. through housing prices, property taxes, fees, etc.)?

I support the Brown County sales tax sharing proposal, which would return the half percent sales tax to the communities that bear the service and infrastructure costs. Brown County needs to evaluate all options that can provide property tax relief, are fiscally responsible and benefit the entire community.

Brown County Board of Supervisors – District 24:

Ross Toellner

Why are you running for office?

I’m a lifelong resident of Brown County. This is where I grew up and chose to raise my family. I’m running because I care deeply about this community and want to make sure county government is working the way it should for the people who live here.

My priorities are straightforward: making sure taxpayers’ dollars are used wisely, helping people better understand what county government actually does, and continuing to keep Brown County clean, sustainable, and a great place to live.

What unique expertise or experience would you bring to this office?

For the past two years, I’ve served as your Brown County Supervisor, and I’ve taken that responsibility seriously. I haven’t missed a single county board meeting, and I don’t believe in voting on something unless I understand it. I make the time to learn the details, ask questions, and listen to different perspectives before decisions are made. I’ve found my role as both a team player and a leader on the board.

Outside of county government, I’ve spent the last 14 years working in Brown County as a teacher and school counselor. That experience has given me a firsthand look at the challenges families, students, and educators face every day—especially when it comes to mental health and access to services. It’s shaped how I approach my work on the board, with a focus on empathy, prevention, and finding practical solutions that actually help people.

What is the most important issue in the county and how would you address it?

Mental health is one of the most important issues facing our county. I see the impact of mental health challenges every day through my work in our schools and in the decisions that come before the county board. We still have work to do when it comes to reducing stigma and making sure people know where to turn for help.

By continuing to work closely with our Health and Human Services team and supporting prevention-focused services, we can make a real difference. When we take mental health seriously, we also see improvements in areas like homelessness, crime, and substance abuse. Addressing issues earlier helps people and makes better use of taxpayer dollars in the long run.

What challenges do you see coming down the road for local governments in the next decade?

Counties across the state are heading toward some tough decisions. With the tax levy capped, adding new services usually means cutting something else. While growth in parts of Brown County has helped us continue providing cost-of-living increases for employees, that won’t be enough forever.

In the coming years, we’re going to need stronger support from the state and federal governments, along with better access to resources that already exist. Local governments can’t keep being asked to do more with less without hitting a breaking point.

If elected, how can you as an elected official of Brown County and the Oneida Nation work together to better all residents of the region?

I believe the relationship between Brown County and the Oneida Nation should be built on respect, communication, and partnership. I will continue to support the service agreements already in place and look for ways to strengthen that cooperation.

During my first two years on the board, I’ve met with Chairman Hill and Treasurer Larry Barton, and I value those conversations. Just as importantly, I want to hear directly from residents of the Oneida Nation. My phone is always on, and I’m ready to listen: (920) 655-8287.

How can you, in your elected position, help address taxpayer and consumer concerns about lack of affordability (i.e. through housing prices, property taxes, fees, etc.)?

I’m proud that the county board has been able to lower property taxes for the past two years while maintaining—and in some cases improving—county services. That doesn’t solve every affordability issue, but it matters.

Rising costs are affecting families everywhere, and local government can’t fix that alone. Part of my job is to speak up to state and federal officials about what our communities are dealing with and to push for policies that actually provide relief, not just more pressure on local taxpayers.

Myra Geraldson

Why are you running for office?

I’m running for office because this community and this country changed my life. I immigrated to the United States about ten years ago and became a proud citizen following the citizenship process in 2022. From the moment I arrived, the people here welcomed me, supported me, and gave me the safety and opportunity I never had growing up.

America is a beautiful place not because it is perfect, but because it opens its doors to those who are willing to work hard, grow, and contribute. This community helped me build a life, find my voice, and become the person I am today.

Running for office is my way of giving back. It’s my way of serving the place that gave me freedom, dignity, and a future. I want to make sure the opportunities I found here remain available for others, and that our community continues to be strong, safe, and welcoming.

What unique expertise or experience would you bring to this office?

I bring a unique combination of lived experience, professional expertise, and deep commitment to Brown County. First and foremost, I’m a proud resident who understands the values, concerns, and strengths of this community. My life experience has taught me what it takes to make tough decisions, stay resilient, and work toward a prosperous future for everyone.

Professionally, I come from a background in financial services. That experience matters. It means I know how to analyze budgets, evaluate spending, and make responsible, informed decisions. As a county supervisor, I will use that expertise to ensure we are spending taxpayer dollars wisely, transparently, and with long‑term stability in mind.

I’m running because I care about this community, and I’m ready to bring both my personal perspective and my financial knowledge to the table to help Brown County grow responsibly and sustainably.

What is the most important issue in your district and how would you address it?

District 24 is a beautiful and thriving part of Brown County. One of the most important issues we face is ensuring that our county budget remains responsible, sustainable, and focused on the right priorities. The county has been working to reduce taxes and manage debt, and those decisions shape everything from basic services to major infrastructure projects.

With my background in financial services, I know how to analyze budgets, ask tough questions, and make sure every dollar is spent wisely. As your representative, I will use my voice and expertise to protect taxpayers, reduce unnecessary spending, and focus our investments on projects that keep our community safe, strong, and prosperous.

What challenges do you see coming down the road for Brown County in the next decade?

Brown County is going to face real pressure from aging public safety facilities and infrastructure, and those challenges will directly affect future spending. Many of the systems we rely on every day, from the emergency operations center to the technology and advanced tools used by law enforcement and first responders are getting older. The same is true for major roads, bridges and transportation corridors that will continue to wear down over time.

If we don’t plan ahead, these needs can hit all at once and force rushed, expensive decisions. But if we stay ahead of the curve, we can make smart, phased investments that protect taxpayers and keep our community safe. Long‑term planning puts us in a position where, when the time comes to replace or upgrade critical systems, we’re ready. Financially and operationally to do it responsibly.

If elected, how can you as an elected official of Brown County and the Oneida Nation work together to better all residents of the region?

If elected, I plan to be a strong partner to the Oneida Nation at the county level. The Nation is an essential part of our region’s history, culture, and economy, and I believe our communities are strongest when we work side by side. My goal is to listen, understand their priorities, and collaborate on solutions to the issues that matter most, whether that’s public safety, infrastructure, economic development, or protecting shared resources.

By building trust, communicating openly, and respecting each other’s sovereignty, we can create policies that benefit all residents of Brown County and the Oneida Nation. Working together isn’t just the right thing to do but It is how we ensure a stronger, more prosperous future for the entire region.

How can you, in your elected position, help address taxpayer and consumer concerns about lack of affordability (i.e. through housing prices, property taxes, fees, etc.)?

The first step in addressing affordability is to be an active listener. When people in our community tell us they’re struggling with rising housing costs, property taxes, or fees, we need to take those concerns seriously and identify real solutions. As the representative for District 24, I will ask the hard questions, think critically, and challenge spending decisions that don’t serve taxpayers.

My priority is to make county government more efficient and responsible so we can lower the tax burden and put more money back into people’s pockets. That means evaluating every dollar we spend, focusing on essential services, and making long‑term financial decisions that keep Brown County affordable for working families, seniors, and homeowners.

Green Bay Common Council – District 12:

Dustin Roeser

Why are you running for office?

My family and extended family have deep roots in Green Bay and the surrounding area of over 100 years. I am now raising my own family here as well. Nineteen “Roeser’s” have gone through the Green Bay MacArthur Elementary school path. We have been on the far west side of Green Bay since 1970. I understand the cultural differences that this district uniquely has. District 12 has the most integrated tribal heritage than any other part of the city.

I care deeply about the long-term success of Green Bay and the quality of life for the people who live here. I want to ensure that Green Bay remains a place where families can afford to live, work, and put down roots; where residents feel their voices are heard at City Hall.

What unique expertise or experience would you bring to this office?

I bring the perspective of an everyday resident. I have worked blue-collar jobs my entire adult life, and I understand first-hand the challenges many families face — rising costs, tight budgets, and the feeling that decisions are sometimes made without considering how they affect working people. I do not approach decisions from a “political” angle. Our city is divided more than ever; I want to change that. I would bring practical, common-sense ideas along with a strong work ethic to the City Council, with a focus on representing ALL the people who live in my district.

What is the most important issue in your district and how would you address it?

Affordability. Affordability includes housing costs, property taxes, rent, and basic city fees. When families are stretched too thin, it affects every part of the community.

Addressing this means being disciplined with city spending, carefully evaluating new projects, and prioritizing policies that support affordable housing options for residents — especially working families and seniors. It also means listening to residents before decisions are made and ensuring city policies do not unintentionally push people out of the neighborhoods they’ve lived in for years.

What challenges do you see coming down the road for local governments in the next decade?

One of the biggest challenges I see is maintaining strong, stable neighborhoods while facing rising costs and increasing outside investment. As more corporations and investment groups buy up single-family homes, it becomes harder for residents to purchase or keep homes in the city. Combined with rising property taxes and rents, this creates real pressure on families and risks making Green Bay less affordable and less residential over time.

Local government will need to strike a careful balance between growth and protecting the character and affordability of our neighborhoods.

If elected, how can the City of Green Bay and the Oneida Nation work together to better all residents of the region?

My great-grandfather had ties to Oneida, spending quite a bit of time at The Guardian Angel Boarding School when he was young. I have always had a sense of pride living near Oneida, where two cultures have always come together in a positive way. I want to further deepen that bond.

The City of Green Bay and the Oneida Nation already share a region, workforce, and economy, and cooperation benefits everyone. The key is maintaining open communication focusing on shared priorities such as infrastructure, public safety, housing, and economic development.

By working collaboratively and respectfully, both governments can identify opportunities where cooperation improves services, strengthens the local economy, and enhances quality of life for residents across the region. A spirit of partnership — rather than competition which benefits everyone who calls this area home.

How can you, in your elected position, help address taxpayer and consumer concerns about affordability?

Affordability starts with responsible budgeting. I would work to identify and reduce wasteful or inefficient spending and ensure that tax dollars are directed toward the highest priorities — public safety, law enforcement, infrastructure, and essential city services.

Elected officials have a responsibility to ask tough questions before approving new spending and to consider the long-term impact on taxpayers. Transparency, accountability, and prioritizing needs over wants are critical to maintaining public trust and keeping Green Bay affordable for residents.

Village of Howard President:

John Muraski

Why are you running for office?

I am running because Howard is home for my family, and I care deeply about where we are headed. I want to protect what makes Howard a great place to live while making smart, steady decisions about growth, public safety, and the cost of living. I also want residents to feel listened to and to have clear information about what the village is doing and why.

What unique experience would you bring to this office?

I have been a Village Trustee since 2018. That means I have real experience working on budgets, planning, and major decisions. I understand how village government works, and I know what it takes to get things done. In my professional work, I help organizations plan, solve problems, and follow through. I bring that same practical, results-focused mindset to the village.

What is the most important issue in Howard and how would you address it?

The biggest issue is managing growth the right way. People want Howard to stay safe, strong, and a great place to raise a family. That takes planning. I will support development that fits our community, keeps neighborhoods strong, and makes sure roads, utilities, and services can handle it. Growth should be thoughtful, not rushed.

What challenges are coming for local governments in the next decade?

Costs will keep rising for roads, public safety, and staffing. Communities will also face new challenges, like cybersecurity, faster technology changes, and more pressure on housing. The best way to handle this is to plan ahead, stick to priorities, and be honest with residents about tradeoffs and long-term costs.

How can Howard and the Oneida Nation work together to benefit the region?

We are neighbors, and we are stronger when we work together. I would focus on respectful, regular communication and practical partnerships. That could include regional planning, economic development, transportation, public safety coordination, and protecting shared natural resources. The goal is simple: better outcomes for all residents across the region.

How can you help with affordability concerns like housing, taxes, and fees?

Affordability starts with responsible budgeting and clear priorities. I will focus on long-term financial planning to avoid surprises, make sure major spending decisions are justified, and look for efficiencies where we can. On housing, we need smart growth that adds options in the right places while protecting established neighborhoods. We also need to grow the tax base in a balanced way so we can fund services without putting too much burden on homeowners.

Public Service Announcements

2026 Wisconsin Gubernatorial Candidates

Democrats

David Crowley — crowleyforwi.com David Crowley for Wisconsin

Sara Rodriguez — saraforwi.com Sara Rodriguez for Wisconsin 

Kelda Roys — keldaforgov.com Kelda Roys for Governor

Francesca Hong — francescahong.com Francesca Hong For Governor

Ryan Strnad — ryanstrnadforgovernor.com ryanstrnadforgovernor.com

Zachary Roper — (no campaign site found yet; primary presence: X profile) x.com/ZacharyRoper03

Republicans

Josh Schoemann — joshschoemann.com Josh Schoemann

Bill Berrien — billforwisconsin.com Bill Berrien for Wisconsin Governor

Andy Manske — andymanske4governor.wordpress.com Andy4WIGov

Minor party / Independent

Jill Ferguson (Green Party) — jillforgovernor.com jillforgovernor.com